When I was in High School, once or twice a week I would get on the PA system and lead the school in the Pledge of Allegiance. Despite not being especially religious, I always said every word, under god, indivisible, and so on without giving it much thought. There's a case in front of the Supreme Court now about whether or not to cut the under god part out. This is very important to some people. I have trouble caring too much. If the decision was mine, I'd take it out, if for no other reason than the fact that it was forcibly inserted into the pledge in the 1950's. I figure that if the pledge today did not contain the phrase "under god" and someone wanted to add it, that would seem silly. We have a lot of deistic traditions in this country, which I am ok with, but adding god to the public sphere, in say, an Alabama courthouse, is something that I couldn't get behind. ... OK, I don't have the energy to address all the issues (some think the pledge is the equivalent of state sponsered christianity, some think removing under god would be an affront to the vast majority of Americans who are "religous," etc.). I just wrote 5 separate paragraphs that I digitally crumpled up and threw in the recycle bin, so I'll just link a blog entry I especially liked: Volokh. James is also talking about this with typical thoughtfulness, and so on and so forth.

“One Nation – indivisible?”

6 Responses

Leave a Reply